-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to Proto v0.5.0 #1588
Update to Proto v0.5.0 #1588
Conversation
…metrics to latest spec changes
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1588 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.44% 91.40% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 165 165
Lines 5052 5013 -39
Branches 1034 1023 -11
==========================================
- Hits 4620 4582 -38
+ Misses 432 431 -1
|
@vmarchaud I know you have tested all 3 versions previously, would you be able to test it again, so that one more person will check if all is working fine, just to double check I haven't missed anything ? |
@obecny sure, i will test tomorrow and update if its fine for me |
Got another error:
|
did you bootstrap all, especially metrics - there were changes |
Yes i did, the repo is a fresh git clone of your branch with EDIT: I dont think we use histogram (only value recorder) in our app too, so i dont understand why i can get the error |
ok so just pls tell me how can I reproduce this error |
Value Recorder has now Histogram aggregator |
Well i'm just creating a new instrument and recording a value, i'm looking at the implementation to see why this error could happen |
ok I have just modified the example
Running docker from this example |
Isn't the method used to record a value for the |
You right it is
Ok, but I'm wondering why are you getting this error then, the api and metrics changed, Did you use a different example with possibility of different api or ? |
@dyladan any idea why EasyCLA is in "waiting mode" ? |
This is a known bug. Have to close and reopen the PR to retrigger the CLA check. |
I didn't follow any example, just implemented the API from my understand. I will try to debug it further tomorrow |
We should use the same example for testing and verifying - by default this is |
Well the example is working for me too, i generally prefer to test with a whole service to avoid bad surprise. |
OK I'm just waiting then for your approval |
@obecny Sorry i forgot the re-approve ! |
'# TYPE value_recorder summary', | ||
'# TYPE value_recorder histogram', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it('should export a ValueRecorder as a summary'
but this assertion was changed to a histogram, is the assertion needed until summaries are brought back? (ex: #982) probably dependent on specification updates?
(would opening a PR to remove this test be appropriate?)
* chore: updating submodule for opentelemetry-proto * chore: necessary changes after upgrade to proto ver. 0.5.0, aligning metrics to latest spec changes * chore: removing examples from lerna bootstrap * chore: cleaning ups unused interfaces * chore: fixing unit test * chore: updating aggregation temporality rules * chore: updating temporality for value recorder * chore: removing unneeded lib * chore: span id and trace id as hex * chore: adding value recorder to example
* chore: updating submodule for opentelemetry-proto * chore: necessary changes after upgrade to proto ver. 0.5.0, aligning metrics to latest spec changes * chore: removing examples from lerna bootstrap * chore: cleaning ups unused interfaces * chore: fixing unit test * chore: updating aggregation temporality rules * chore: updating temporality for value recorder * chore: removing unneeded lib * chore: span id and trace id as hex * chore: adding value recorder to example
Which problem is this PR solving?
Short description of the changes